Photography Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Photography - Essay ExamplePublic disclo real of orphic facts would be another basis for a tort involving photography. For instance, if one takes a picture of another at an AIDS clinic, and it is clear that this picture was taken at an AIDS clinic, and this picture was published, then this would be public disclosure of private facts, and it would be actionable. Publicity that places another in a false light is another hindrance. Perhaps an example of this would be to photograph a teetotaler with a beverage that resembles a beer, when it is actually a non-alcoholic beer. The fourth major restriction is that one cannot take anothers likeness or name to single-valued function for ones own advantage (Krages, 2007). An example of this might be taking a picture of nighbody, then putting this picture up on ones own website and use it, without permission, to advertise ones business. While the right to photograph others in public is pretty straightforward, in that, with some restrictions, there is generally a right to photograph individuals in public, it is different in private places. This might include residences, museums, concerts, etc. The owner of the venue or the residence has a right to restrict photography within the residence or venue. Generally they post signs stating this fact, but, even if they do not, they have the right to verbally prohibit photographers from taking photographs (Manning, 2012). In general, I think that photography laws are just right. I believe that anyone has the right to photograph anybody on the street, yet I also see the need for the restrictions. If an individual is suffering from AIDS and does not want this known, then he or she has the right to nonplus sure that his or her picture at the clinic is not publicized. This is a basic privacy right to keep ones illness hidden, and it is perfectly acceptable to make sure that this privacy right is not abridged. Likewise, it is a clear invasion of privacy to take pictures with long-ran ge lenses, so this is another excellent restriction. The false light restriction also goes a long way to protecting privacy and protecting others from defamation. In other words, I feel that the restrictions upon photographing individuals provide an excellent balance between the first amendment rights of photographers with the privacy rights of individuals. As for restrictions in private residences and venues, I wish that these restrictions would be lessened, although I understand that private places have a right to make these restrictions. Discussion 3 According to Mendelson (2007), paparazzi are denigrated by journalists, who do not consider what he paparazzi do to be in line with journalisms ethics. This is because they are intrusive and often harass their celebrity prey. Not only that, their focus is often on the trivial, as opposed to the focus of a salutary journalist. Alach (2008) takes issue with the fact that the paparazzi invade the celebritys privacy. He also decries the ir tactics, stating that paparazzi often scare the children of celebrities, and that they often hunt in packs, with hordes of photographers, who have been tipped onward about a certain celebritys whereabouts, ambushing the hapless celebrity and the family of the celebrity. Alach (2008) finds paparazzi to be exploitive, therefore their First Amendment rights